Thomas Jefferson and Sarah Palin


Thomas Jefferson and Sarah Palin
by Lynda

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with inherent and inalienable rights; that among these, are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed; that whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness.” –Declaration of Independence as originally written by Thomas Jefferson, 1776.

How as a nation have we come so far from those words? The words are clear “government derives their powers from the consent of the governed.”

When we as the governed stand up and speak out we are called “right wing nuts who are holding to our bibles and guns, crazy, and un-American “, so far away from Jefferson’s words.

Over the years we the people have elected men and women, who when asking for our vote seem to have read the words of Thomas Jefferson but in time they forget that they govern for us not in spite of we the people. They no longer want to listen nor feel that we have the right to speak out and when we do we are called un-American as if our opinion no longer matters.

But, a lady named Sarah Palin not only read but understood the words. She believed as did Jefferson that our Creator had endowed use with inherent and inalienable rights; life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. But more than that she understood that to secure those rights the power of the government most come from the consent of its people, not the other way around and if we lost that we would be the generation that would tell our grandchildren about an America that was but is no more.

Sarah Palin like Ezekiel has chose to obey God and in her on way has become like him a street preacher; no matter what she wakes to face each day she does not allow anyone or any situation to stop her from speaking because she knows that she has listened and obeyed her God and with that knowledge she can speak to and for the people. With Jefferson’s words and her trust in God she speaks and I listen as I would have listened to Ezekiel the “street preacher”.


by Mark David Shaw M.T.S.
Restore America Together Network
Executive National Director
Tea Party Conservatives for Freedom

mdssmallThe erosion of foundations is how an enemy takes power and control when using a long term plan.  Erode the foundations upon which something is built and it will crumble.  Erode the foundations upon which this nation was founded, fundamental change is possible.  Erode the foundations of history, evil can then be repeated.  Look at how each one of these foundations are being destroyed.  Add to that Christianity and you have a recipe for failure.

Let us begin with history.  Why would it be necessary to hide or eliminate certain events in history?  History provides a clear mirror to the future.  It reveals where mankind has gone wrong and where mankind has got it right.   By looking at and analyzing history, we can see how to go forward, what to protect, and what to guard against. Case in point, the religious beliefs of our founders.

The founding of this country was presided over by a group of men, most of which were adherents to the Christian faith.  They used the tenants of this faith to form their reason for separation from Great Britain.  In the Declaration of Independence they chronicled the grievances the colonies had against the motherland.  The foundation or basis of these grievances was the Christian God of the bible.  God was invoked and rights were addressed.

The purpose in undermining these things can be found in the desire to fundamentally change our government system.  Why get rid of our historic foundations?  What happens when citizen Joe does not know that he has inalienable rights to freedom, life, and property?  Those things can be taken away.  There can be only one reason why revisionists want to paint our founders in a different palate; it is to do harm to the American citizen.  Otherwise, they would trumpet the founding of our country.

Let’s look at another historic event that is under fire.  This event is not even that far behind us.  I am speaking of the Holocaust.  Toxic skinheads, Arian white supremacists, and Islamists all claim that the Holocaust never happened and that it is all a fabrication of the Jew.  What would be the reason for these groups to dismiss this very well documented event in history?  There can only be one answer.  So that harm can again come the Jewish people.  That is the common thread that runs through each of the aforementioned groups.

The reason is the same, change the history so that you can change the culture that will accept what you want to do.  This is true no matter what segment of society you want to undermine. Finally, the erosion of Christianity is the most dangerous of them all.  Again, why would anyone want to erode Christianity?  Let’s take a step back for a bit.

Do you see a concentrated effort to erode Islam?  Do you see an attempt to erode New Ageism?  Do you see a concentrated effort to erode Buddhism?   Do we see people trying to destroy Hinduism?  What is it about Christianity that it attracts people who will go to such lengths to undermine its premise?  Judeo/Christianity alone provides a systematic, uncompromising, non-contradicting way of acting as a standard to measure the actions of all people.

Remove that standard of measure and anything goes.  What would be the standard upon which each person could measure the actions of another if you remove the biblical moral code?  It would have to be based in each individual’s definition of morality.  When each individual gets to make up their own rules because there is no other transcendent standard to appeal to, any action can be justified.

The importance of an unchanging code of behavior upon which we judge the actions of ourselves and others cannot be understated.  The necessity of a transcendent God becomes a clear beam of light that reveals, that shows us the path upon which we are to walk.   Are we so sure we want to scrap the Almighty God and His wisdom as a means to know the reality of sin and darkness?  Look at history, the one that has not been revised.  You will find it replete with good and evil.  But only if you measure the actions by that inescapable intuitive knowledge of good and evil that was placed in all human beings by an all knowing Creator to guide them on a path to blessing.

Only the forces of evil and darkness would want to undermine that foundation.  Know thy enemy, and know him well.  Never take your eye off of them, never assume they have seen the light.  They are ruthless, for they only abide by the rules they make for themselves.  That ancient biblical text still lives and breathes upon our consciences today and it too warns us to be careful with those who do what is right in their own eyes.

The Utilitarian

by Mark David Shaw M.T.S.
Restoring America Together Network
Executive National Director
Tea Party Conservatives For Freedom

mdssmallBeliefs matter!  They can do harm or they can do good.  Behind every action is a belief that generated that action.  There has been a wholesale attempt to remove critical thinking skills from the American public.  First and foremost among them is “you cannot judge.”  This statement alone has done more damage to our culture than nearly anything I can think of.  It has produced a culture that thinks their individual opinions are off limits and cannot be judged by others.  Well, I am about to judge.

I am going to be doing a series of short videos on Saul Alinsky and the book he authored titled “Rules for Radicals.”  Many of you are aware that it appears that the tactics found in this book have been employed by the radical left and have been effective in making conservatives appear to be what they are not.  Before I study a person’s writings, I study the person who is writing.  I don’t just need to know what they say, but why they are saying it.  This allows for a critical analysis of their writing. Case in point is Saul Alinsky.

Saul Alinsky’s philosophy is utilitarianism.  This system of belief states that whatever brings the greatest amount of happiness to the greatest amount of people is what should be employed. This belief also crosses into pragmatism. Whereas utilitarianism is the doctrine that the end of all action should be the greatest happiness of the greatest number[1], pragmatism stresses practical consequences as constituting the essential criterion in determining meaning, truth, or value.[2] Both of these positions are not concerned with the morality of an issue.  It might make me happy to have a new car, but stealing that new car would be immoral.

What does all of this mean?  It means that a person who is a utilitarian or a pragmatist will likely believe that the end always justifies the means used to achieve that end.  When you remove morality as a driving factor this is the type of belief system you wind up with.  This is what is wrong with the Democratic Party.  They are employing these utilitarian and pragmatic methods for all Americans.  This is how it works.  By making the most people happy, you get the most votes which maintains your hold on power.  This is the real “reason” behind these methods.

What if there is a large number of people who want affordable health care?  What if another group of people want amnesty?  You can see where I am going.  It matters nothing to the utilitarian that it is immoral to take from one group of people to provide for another group of people.  This is what socialists do.  It also matters not to the Democrat that it is immoral to reward people for breaking the law.  This is what utilitarianism produces.  Those Democrats that engage in immoral processes to accomplish their goals are actually a strange breed of neo-utilitarians.  These neo-utilitarians espouse an end that is divorced from their own reasoning.  For instance, they claim that compassionate humanism is the end they are driving for in giving millions of illegal aliens amnesty.  The truth however, is that the actual end they seek is to produce an environment where the Democrat will maintain their power in government by eliciting that group’s votes.  Perhaps others are unwilling to state the obvious, but I will.  The Democratic Party is morally bankrupt!  One only needs to watch the means they employ to achieve their end goals.

The good news is that utilitarianism is self collapsing.  What the Democrats seem to miss is that by trying to make the most number of people happy they are merely temporarily making them happy.  As the consequence of their means of achieving that goal kicks in, many others are then made unhappy by those same actions.  This is the precipice upon which we find current political sentiment.  I was speaking to a college kid the other day who said, “I am voting all Republican this time.  I just can’t seem to get ahead.”  That is the consequence to neo-utilitarianism.






The American Spirit

The American Spirit. A very rare, powerful thing at it’s best. It has been tried and tested to the highest degrees. Those who contain that wild spirit are often called crazy. Most recently they’ve been called racist, extremist…among other “colorful” terms. At best, the American Spirit is something you just can’t extinguish.

Think about it. It isn’t just about fighting or protesting big government. America has always been the first responder when it comes to international tragedy. Be it a natural disaster, war strife or poverty. You name it, we’ve been there to help with recovery. We’re one of the only nations with the capabilities of providing large amounts of humanitarian aid, and we don’t blink an eye at providing it. Because it’s what we do. Americans, at heart, are very generous. However, I must say, we are very tenacious and aggressive when we have to be.

There comes a point in time when we as Americans need to stop fixing the world’s problems and solve our own. Don’t get me wrong, there’s nothing wrong with helping others. We, as a nation, are crippled though. Our rights are being stripped away because of global distractions. The administration knows we have big hearts, and they’re taking advantage of it. This is where we need to tap in to that aggressive side and fight back. We can’t just allow the government, along with the rest of the world, pin us in a corner. No, we’re better than that. There was a time where Americans would be like a German Shepherd protecting it’s master from harm. We would tirelessly pursue who hurt our family, and inflict harm on them. Not anymore, instead, we arm them and train them. What happened to us? Have we become so numb to the world that we don’t notice that it has driven a dagger into our back? What will it take for us to stop retreating and reload? When will we stop letting people just walk on us? We are Americans! We’re stronger, smarter, faster and better than that!

Americans, the real American, we are a rare breed in this world. Back before this administration painted us as weak and apologetic, we were feared and respected. Now? Now we are the laughing stock of the world. What happened to the fighting spirit we had before? Did we get complacent? I think we did. Scratch that, I know we did. We got cozy in our American homes, American jobs…..going out and practicing American traditions. We lost sight of what that spirit really represents. Strength, courage, power, grace, tenacity and ambition. No one dared to disrespect America or inflict harm on her. Wake up America, if we don’t fight now, we will never be able to turn this ship around.

What Would Government Without God Look Like?

by Mark David Shaw M.T.S.
Restore America Together Network
Executive National Director of Tea Party Conservatives for Freedom

mds-smallThe first major change you would see in a government that denies the existence of God is that unalienable rights would have no foundation and thus begin to disappear.  If there is no God, then there can be no rights that are given by God.  Any rights that would exist would then be derived from other human beings.  If other human beings can give a right, then that right can change or even be removed by human beings.  Government would be the entity from which a person’s rights are derived, but the definition of those rights would be left to those representatives who make up that government entity.  Hence, government would take the position of god in its definition of good and evil.

Under this system of government, you would possess nothing that the government could not rightly remove from you.  I say “rightly” because there would be no transcendent moral standards to which you could appeal.  Without a standard, morality would be the mere machinations of human beings subject to change on a whim.  Morality could hold no weight beyond human opinion.  Because of this, all morals would have to be relative.  This would establish each human as the progenitor of their own moral codes which could not be extended beyond themselves without violating another of their ability to define their own morals. One could come into agreement with a group to establish a common moral code of conduct and thus establish a social moral relativism.  However, this would amount to tyranny by the majority since the majority opinion becomes the law of the land.  This is why a constitutional republic is so important.  All laws must be measured against those rights enumerated in the constitution.

In a worldview without God, man becomes his own god.  All proclamations of good and evil would have no other basis than the mind from which it came. With morality being the brainchild of each human, those in governmental positions would have the power to imposition others to their particular individual brand of morality, which could equal nothing more than their mere opinion.

What about human life?  It could no longer be sacred because the notion of “sacred” only exists within the concept of God.  Sacredness of human life can only exist if humans are created in the image of God.  Without God, humans can claim no more value than anything else that is natural.  This would lead to a philosophical position where animals and plants are elevated to a status worthy of human life.  With a devaluation of human life, it becomes easier and more palatable to take human life.  We could even conceivably see it become a morality to take human life to protect plant and animal life.

What about liberty?  Because liberty would be a conflation of the state, the state would have sole power to grant or remove any right that is derived from the state.  With morals being relative rather than absolute, liberty would be unstable and ever changing.  Equality would be a thing of the past as glad-handing and favors would generate the most liberty for groups and individuals willing to play along.

What about property?  Your right to your own property would also be derived from the state.  Since the state is functioning as god by defining good and evil, all property could be absconded by the state with the justification that it is a “good” thing they are doing.  Again, since morality would be relative, the right to property would change based upon the winds of culture.  You might start hearing terms like “social justice” as a state sponsored reason to extract your property from you.  Whatever the stated “ill” of the time is, the state would use that as a reason for taking what is yours to “justly” putting it into the hands of another but especially themselves.  Favors would be given to political allies and penalties would be commissioned against political enemies.

Does this look strangely familiar?  As our culture looses the notion of a transcendent Almighty God, it will begin to elect likeminded individuals to represent it.  As these godless individuals attain power, they begin to govern in a way that ignores absolute moral standards. A nation that looses the notion of God will fall.  As our culture flirts with secularism, it becomes apparent that these individuals are unaware that they are gnawing at the very foundation that holds them secure in their unalienable rights. As they do, at a certain point the weight of secularism collapses the very house that holds them.


Providence and National Sins

Susie photo CBI

by Susan Snelling
Restoring America Together Network
Regional Director of the North Central States
Tea Party Conservatives for Freedom

The American flag stands awash in a sea of blood. It’s the blood of Founders and Framers and named and unnamed patriots who lie in flag draped caskets or on battlefields while on missions far from home. They lie in the heart of every American who enjoys the freedoms secured for this nation. But there is a stars and stripes that is not fitting for full-staff, perhaps only half-staff at best. Better yet, turn it upside down, for this is a nation in distress and in many sectors it does not even know it.

Just as the blood of patriots spilled for this great nation calls out for justice; the blood of an entire generation of those unborn but terminated cry out from their early grave. Found in dumpsters and toilet bowls and cylinders meant for medical refuse, the silent bellowing of these future patriots rends Heaven’s air. We mere mortals may never hear their voices and their silence to us is deafening, but their Creator is attuned to their pleas.

The sea of bodies that were meant to be citizens of the United States lay silent to our ears, breathless, never given a chance to live out their destinies. America, the land of the free and the home of the brave, has become a refuse and garbage dump for millions of lives created by God and knit together lovingly in their mothers’ wombs. It is a national holocaust of enormous proportions when over 50 million and counting have their lives stolen from them.

The lies of the modern American liberal have brought one of the most egregious national sins upon America. They lied to the new mothers that abortion is safe and a healthy alternative. The Church stood by silently, except for a few quarters, while heaven beheld the unquenchable stench of a nation turned to their basest and deep-seated hatred of all that is holy. Proponents of abortion place the value of their freedom and prosperity over the value of the life of their own progeny.

It has been reported that if the Founding Fathers had the modern technology that we have today, they would say that life began at conception. Their held belief was that life began when the mother felt the baby move. We have more knowledge now through scientific advancement that life begins far before that happens.

Yet, the unjust will murder for convenience. The women are lied to so they believe that abortion is acceptable and even in some cases preferable. And those who have not become reprobate and hardened from suppressing the truth, suffer from the knowledge that they took the life of their own. The pain they hold within has ramifications and so does their actions. God forgives them when they turn to Him and He binds up their wounds. But there is always someone else who is entering the same journey based on the lies of the proponents of abortion.

The children cry out from the graves. There must be Divine retribution, you know. A nation that does not nationally repent of their sins will receive the just harvest from the seed they have sown. Everything is seed time and harvest, the bible says, and so it is. America has sown wickedness through lies and deception to countless men and women that it is good and permissible to kill your unborn child and it is even promoted amongst the youth. Haughty academicians, politicians, news reporters and media types, savvy in wickedness, promote it to the world.

What other national sins has America engaged in and not repented or turned away from? Where is the sorrow and shame for immorality promoted amongst the youth, attempting to corrupt an entire generation? Attempting to abort them from their God-designed purposes? Rob them of their destinies and assure that this great Republic will come under judgment?

The Founding Fathers understood a great principle of Divine Providence which was that individuals are judged during the great judgment at the end of history as we know it, but nations, who cannot be judged later, are judged in the here and now. Where does America stand? Will there be national repentance for national sins or will God say, enough.

George Mason, Revolutionary statesman and delegate from Virginia to the Constitutional Convention said:

“Every master of slaves is born a petty tyrant. They bring the judgement of heaven upon a country. As nations cannot be rewarded or punished in the next world, they must be in this. By an inevitable chain of causes and effects, Providence punishes national sins, by national calamities.”

We can take whatever action necessary to push back against bad legislation and bad legislators and the progressives who would take us spiraling fast toward socialism or some other “ism,” but until there is repentance for, a turning away from, those things that are an affront to the Almighty, we will see limited success.

Let the unborn cry out and those wronged on other fronts get their justice. What will it take, America? What will it take to wake you up to your purpose and destiny, as a protector of the inalienable rights of all born and yet to be born. “The right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” seems to be a forgotten phrase by the liberal left unless they are applying it to themselves in whatever manner they choose. However, it is not a selective edict. It applies to all, born and unborn.

To those who think God does not judge a nation for national sins does not understand the God of the bible. They want to live in a fantasy world. Even Thomas Jefferson, who the left likes to say was not a Christian, grasped the concept of the nature and character of God when he said:

“I tremble for my country to think that God is just and will not be quiet forever.”

Do you tremble for your country? You should. We are the watchers on the wall, the caretakers of this great Republic that our forefathers gave their all for. Nothing less should be expected from us, the heirs and guardians of this grand experiment, to ensure that inalienable rights, those God-given rights, are secure for all of us and those yet to come.

What is an “Inalienable” Right?

by Mark David Shaw M.T.S.
Restoring America Together Network
Executive National Director
Tea Party Conservatives for Freedom

mds-smallIf we are to understand our Declaration of Independence, we first need to understand what an “inalienable right” is.  Note that our Declaration of Independence states that these inalienable rights are endowed by our Creator.  All inalienable rights must originate from God.  Why?  An inalienable right is another way of saying an “absolute right.”  An absolute right can only come from an absolute God.  Governments are not absolute hence they cannot confer an absolute right nor do they have the right to remove it from anyone. It is actually the duty of government to protect those rights.

Only the giver of a right has the “right” to remove it. How these absolute rights are discovered is to observe the natural state of human beings.  This is why inalienable rights are also called “natural rights.”  For instance, Thomas Jefferson stated, “Almighty God has created the mind free.”  Because of this, no one has the right to control or suppress our thoughts.  When government encroaches upon my right to think as I want, even if that thought is wrong or immoral, they overstep their bounds and take powers that are not intrinsic to government. It is only when that immorality of mind crosses over into immorality of action where victims are abridged of their rights as a result of that behavior, does government have the right to step in to suppress that behavior.  Why does government have a right to interfere then?  Because there is a victim whose rights have been violated and it is the duty of government to protect these rights equally.

This was the basis or foundation of our Declaration of Independence.  The British government was stepping upon these rights and our Declaration of Independence was written to express to them that they do not have that right to trample our inalienable rights.  These rights were not conferred by government and they cannot be transferred to the government for control.

These rights only belong to the individual and not to groups.  This is important because we hear terms like “human rights” and “civil rights.”  Groups cannot have inalienable rights for that would presuppose that other groups do not have those same rights.

These absolute rights must transcend us because we are not absolute beings; hence, they must be conferred by a transcendent Being.  We must understand that it is the nature of a government, unrestrained by the people, to suppress these rights.  This is why an electorate that does not vigilantly monitor their government will become enslaved by it.  Political parties will also gravitate toward abridgement of these natural rights as well.  Our only defense against this is an educated and vigilant electorate.

Presently, many Americans have no idea who their representatives are let alone what type of government they are in, yet they still exercise their right to vote at the polls.  If we are to save this country, we must not only concentrate upon what our representatives are doing and getting the best of humanity into those positions, but also we must reintroduce as many citizens as possible to their form of government and the need to be vigilant to maintain their inalienable rights.

If we only seek to change our representatives to save our country, then we are short sighted with regard to the root of the problem.  That root or foundation of government is the people who are being governed.  When the people cease to acknowledge Almighty God, they also cease to have a basis for inalienable rights. They are then likely to support likeminded individuals as their representatives and elect enemies of our republic which, if left unfettered, will result in the subjugation of our most valuable possession, our inalienable rights.

The Cult Like Symptoms of the Left

by Mark David Shaw M.T.S.
Restoring America Together Network
Executive National Director
Tea Party Conservatives for Freedom
mds-smallThis is not meant to be a professional analysis but rather my own personal observation.  Being a minister I have had the opportunity to help various people come out of cults.  I am always amazed at the control these leaders would have over these poor people.  Recently I notice a local newscast about a cult nearby.  One couple who had escaped told stories of some of their experiences. I will just share one to make a point.

This couple was married and the wife was pregnant.  The cult leader suggested that this pregnancy was not God’s will.  His instruction was for the woman to run so that she would lose the child.  Her husband was given the command to watch her to verify that she complied.  She did, and he did.  She did not lose the child and gave birth to a normal child.

What struck me was these are adults with adult minds.  Why would they submit to such a foolish command?  As a man, I cannot understand why her husband did not rebel against this command.  Common sense suggests that if his wife is pregnant then it is the will of God.  Although it might look like a simple dilemma to most of us, it was obviously not so clear for the victims.  Yes, I said victims.

Then it struck me.  This behavior is much like those who are leftist.  Commonsense just does not apply.  What causes this?  Like the couple in the cult, they “believed” in what their leader was saying.  Now, I am not opposed to obeying leaders but I am opposed to doing so when the command is knowingly evil.  Isn’t this concept what we learned from the Nuremburg trials?  Nazi officials were taking the “I was just following orders” defense. What we learned is that even in the military which must rely upon obedience to commands there is a personal responsibility not to cross certain boundaries.

For instance, what if a despotic commander-in-chief told our military to arrest, and even kill citizens of America in America?  Each individual soldier has a personal responsibility to rebel against such a command.  Why would some, perhaps, be willing to follow that command?  It could only be because they believe in the leader giving the command or in their philosophy.  So, like the Nazi’s on trial, they would be guilty as well.

The couple in the cult would have been personally responsible if she had lost her child.  But all of this brings up a bigger point.  Let me give you another example.  I used to get a newsletter called The Schwarz Report.  I remember one particular letter that shocked me to my core.

Dr. Fred Schwarz was speaking at a large hotel at one of his conferences and during the break, he decided to seek out other conferences and see if he could set in on one.  The one he found was on environmentalism and the story you are about to hear, I believe, is true because of the integrity of Dr. Schwarz.  In this conference the speaker was talking about how over-population was endangering the earth.  He was giving the audience various solutions to the problem.  In one solution the speaker suggested that officials create enough of the Ebola virus to infect the populations around the globe.  His reasoning was that because this virus has a near 10% survival rate that this would leave about 10% of the population alive on our poor over-populated planet.

How did the crowd react?  Did they boo this speaker for the stupidity of this suggestion?  No, they gave him a standing ovation.  This is very cult like don’t you think?  These were leftists environmentalists who had bought into leftist philosophies.  So much so, that apparently they were all ready to die to save our planet, unless they thought that the gods would favor them since they are so superior to the rest of humanity.

Why?  Why would thinking adults follow such foolery without as much as a question?  Cults control their followers using emotion.  One of the emotions that is very successful is a feeling of superiority.  Hitler used it in his attempt to exterminate the Jews. These cult leaders get their followers to think that everyone on the outside just does not understand them and that they alone have the way of truth making them superior.

Interestingly, this is the vibe I get from liberals.  Even the policies reveal this.  They do not think the rest of Americans can handle their wallet, their children, and their personal lives.  They believe that they are the superior guardians that must step in and handle your affairs for you. When I question liberals, I find that they just regurgitate what their leaders have told them.  When I ask them to think that through to its end, they get defensive and then launch into question begging epitaphs.

I asked myself the question the other day, “Why do we Republicans have such spirited debates and the Democrats are all just saying the same thing?”  The answer is “cult syndrome.”  The free thinker ponders, then questions.  The brain washed just respond with rhetoric memorization. Now I am not saying all Democrats are like this but the ones I have interacted with sure were.  What I fear is that because the Democrats have been so successful with this tactic, Republicans will begin to follow suit.  Our country was born in and out of passionate debate.  Let us not resort to mind numbing as a way of feigning unity.  Don’t give into the political correct ideology of never questioning or debating.  This is America and we are Americans.  We are strong, we are spirited, we love liberty, we think critically, and we do not lay down our conscience when given a command!